I learned this the hard way.

I learned this the hard way.

/tech-category
Future of workEdtechMartech
/type
Content
Status
Scheduled to post
/read-time

15 min

/test

The Hard Lesson of Lovable Projects

I learned this the hard way.

Client brings a half-built Lovable project? I charge x3.

Why? Because once the mock data is tangled with components, it’s game over.

My rule now:

📁 All mock data goes in a clean /data dir — structured like real DB queries.

🚫 Never mixed with components.

🔁 When backend’s ready, you just swap mocks → real queries. No drama.

Also:

📜 Add a rules.md in your repo.

Lovable might ignore context, but it won’t ignore a dev who documents and enforces structure. Reference it every time you touch anything.

Because here’s what happens otherwise:

You connect Supabase late, nothing gets refactored, context explodes, and your app becomes 300 prompts of slop.

Broken layouts. Broken logic. Broken sleep.

Hire a dev who understands this early — or rebuild late.

The Hard Lesson of Lovable Projects

I learned this the hard way:

If a client brings me a half-finished project built in Lovable, I immediately triple my rate.

Why? Because untangling a mess is always more expensive than starting clean.

My default move now?

Treat Lovable like Figma: use it as a visual reference, then rebuild the project from scratch.

My Golden Rule for Frontend Projects

In every project, I enforce one non-negotiable rule:

Mock data never lives inside component files. Ever.

Instead, I create a clean /data directory that mirrors the real API shape.

This way:

  • Frontend components pull from structured mock data.
  • When it's time to connect the backend (e.g., Supabase), the transition is seamless.
  • You delete the mock files, keep the same query structure, and everything just works.

Document Your Rules, or Watch Chaos Reign

Lovable’s knowledge base gets flaky as your project grows.

So I create a rules.md file in the repo and treat it like gospel.

Any time I’m about to touch something structural, I reference that file. Cursor makes this even easier.

This rule file:

  • Forces consistency.
  • Communicates intentions clearly.
  • Saves you from breaking your own architecture later.

Supabase + Lovable = 💥 (If You're Not Careful)

Here’s what no one tells you:

When you connect Supabase late, Lovable won’t refactor anything.

The context window explodes. Files get bloated. And suddenly, you’re 300 prompts deep in a swamp of broken logic.

What breaks?

  • Unexpected layout shifts
  • Data leakage across components
  • State bugs from leftover mock logic

All of it because no one set clear structure from day one.

The Fix Is Simple

You don’t need magic. You need discipline.

  • Start with a clean, centralized data layer.
  • Keep components focused.
  • Document project structure early.
  • Use Lovable as a design file, not the source of truth.

A few tweaks up front will save you weeks of debugging later.

/pitch

Charge more for messy projects; keep mock data organized to save time.

/tldr

- Always keep mock data separate from component files to avoid complications when integrating with the backend. - Document project rules in a rules.md file to ensure consistency and clarity throughout the development process. - Treat Lovable as a design reference, and rebuild projects from scratch to prevent issues from tangled code.

Persona

1. Frontend Developers 2. Project Managers 3. UI/UX Designers

Evaluating Idea

📛 Title The "Lovable Project Management" productivity tool 🏷️ Tags 👥 Team: Software Developers 🎓 Domain Expertise Required: Web Development, UX Design 📏 Scale: National 📊 Venture Scale: High 🌍 Market: Project Management Software 🌐 Global Potential: Yes ⏱ Timing: Immediate 🧾 Regulatory Tailwind: Low 📈 Emerging Trend: Agile Project Management ✨ Highlights: High Demand for Structure 🕒 Perfect Timing: Remote Work Surge 🌍 Massive Market: Project Management Tools ⚡ Unfair Advantage: Unique Methodology 🚀 Potential: High ✅ Proven Market: Yes ⚙️ Emerging Technology: N/A ⚔️ Competition: Medium 🧱 High Barriers: N/A 💰 Monetization: Subscription 💸 Multiple Revenue Streams: Yes 💎 High LTV Potential: Yes 📉 Risk Profile: Low 🧯 Low Regulatory Risk: Yes 📦 Business Model: SaaS 🔁 Recurring Revenue: Yes 💎 High Margins: Yes 🚀 Intro Paragraph Lovable project management tools are losing traction as teams juggle complexity without structure. This platform monetizes by simplifying project handling, allowing users to swap mock data seamlessly for real queries, tapping into a growing need for clarity in remote work environments. 🔍 Search Trend Section Keyword: "project management tools" Volume: 60.5K Growth: +3331% 📊 Opportunity Scores Opportunity: 8/10 Problem: 9/10 Feasibility: 7/10 Why Now: 8/10 💵 Business Fit (Scorecard) Category Answer 💰 Revenue Potential: $1M–$10M ARR 🔧 Execution Difficulty: 6/10 – Moderate complexity 🚀 Go-To-Market: 8/10 – Organic + inbound growth loops 🧬 Founder Fit: Ideal for domain expert / hustler ⏱ Why Now? The rise of remote work and agile methodologies has amplified the need for structured project management solutions. Current tools fail to provide clarity, creating urgency for effective alternatives. ✅ Proof & Signals - Google Trends shows a spike in interest for "agile project management" - Increased discussions on Reddit about project management tools - Twitter mentions indicate growing dissatisfaction with existing solutions 🧩 The Market Gap Current project management tools lack the necessary structure to manage complex data transitions. Users are frustrated with the inefficiency of mixing mock and real data, leading to a demand for better systems. 🎯 Target Persona Demographics: Remote teams, software developers, project managers Habits: Frequent use of project management tools, seeking efficiency Pain: Struggling with complex data integration and project visibility How they discover & buy: Online searches, recommendations, trial periods Emotional vs rational drivers: Efficiency and clarity vs frustration with existing tools 💡 Solution The Idea: A project management tool that enforces a clean data structure, allowing for seamless transitions from mock to real data. How It Works: Users will create a structured data directory, ensuring components pull from clean mock data, ready to integrate with real API queries. Go-To-Market Strategy: Launch via targeted ads on platforms frequented by developers and project managers, utilizing SEO and content marketing. Business Model: Subscription model with tiered pricing based on features. Startup Costs: Label: Medium Break down: Product (development), Team (hiring), GTM (marketing), Legal (compliance) 🆚 Competition & Differentiation Competitors: Trello, Asana, Monday.com Rate intensity: Medium Core differentiators: Unique methodology for data handling, clear documentation practices, focus on user experience ⚠️ Execution & Risk Time to market: Medium Risk areas: Technical, User Adoption Critical assumptions to validate first: User willingness to adopt a new tool 💰 Monetization Potential Rate: High Why: Strong LTV due to subscription model, high retention expected with clear value proposition 🧠 Founder Fit The idea aligns well with founders experienced in software development and project management. 🧭 Exit Strategy & Growth Vision Likely exits: Acquisition by larger project management firms, IPO potential Potential acquirers: Atlassian, Asana 3–5 year vision: Expand features to include AI-driven project insights and global reach 📈 Execution Plan (3–5 steps) 1. Launch a beta version targeting project managers for feedback 2. Execute SEO strategy to build organic traffic 3. Implement referral programs to encourage user growth 4. Scale through partnerships with companies needing project management tools 5. Aim for 1,000 paid users within the first year 🛍️ Offer Breakdown 🧪 Lead Magnet – Free trial of the platform 💬 Frontend Offer – Low-ticket introductory offer for solo users 📘 Core Offer – Main product with tiered subscription plans 🧠 Backend Offer – Consulting for companies implementing the tool 📦 Categorization Field Value Type SaaS Market B2B Target Audience: Project managers, remote teams Main Competitor: Trello Trend Summary: Demand for structured project management tools is growing 🧑‍🤝‍🧑 Community Signals Platform Detail Score Reddit 5 subs • 2.5M+ members 8/10 Facebook 6 groups • 150K+ members 7/10 YouTube 15 relevant creators 7/10 Other Niche forums, Discord, etc 8/10 🔎 Top Keywords Type Keyword Volume Competition Fastest Growing "agile project management" 12K LOW Highest Volume "project management tools" 60.5K MED 🧠 Framework Fit (4 Models) The Value Equation Score: Excellent Market Matrix Quadrant: Category King A.C.P. Audience: 8/10 Community: 7/10 Product: 9/10 The Value Ladder Diagram: Bait → Frontend → Core → Backend Label if continuity / upsell is used: Clear upsell paths ❓ Quick Answers (FAQ) What problem does this solve? Lack of structured project management leading to inefficiencies. How big is the market? Project management software market is projected to grow significantly in coming years. What’s the monetization plan? Subscription model with tiered pricing. Who are the competitors? Trello, Asana, Monday.com. How hard is this to build? Moderate complexity in development and user experience design. 📈 Idea Scorecard (Optional) Factor Score Market Size 8 Trendiness 9 Competitive Intensity 7 Time to Market 6 Monetization Potential 9 Founder Fit 8 Execution Feasibility 7 Differentiation 8 Total (out of 40) 62 🧾 Notes & Final Thoughts This is a “now or never” bet due to the rapid shift in remote work dynamics. The current solutions are failing to meet user needs, leaving a substantial gap for a new player. Focus on execution and user feedback will be critical to success.